Trump's North Barn secret service protectors were being shot at,
possibly to distract them, rather than to hit them.
The west side secret service policeman has never been interviewed, possibly because he was hit.
His east side partner was interviewed 21 August 2024 by the US Senate's Homeland Services and Government Affairs Counsel(Majority):
Note: "Majority", in August 2024, was the Democratic Party, because 51 US Senators were Democrats and 49 US Senators were Republicans, so the questions below were asked by a lawyer chosen by Democratic senators.
HSGA COUNSEL(Majority):
Question: "Do you remember the number of shots you heard? Were you able to count?"
WITNESS:
Answer: "I couldn't count, but it seemed endless."
HSGA COUNSEL(MAJORITY):
Question: "Endless. Could you tell what direction they were coming from?"
WITNESS:
Answer: "Not--I couldn't pinpoint a direct, like location where they were coming from..."
When a US Senate lawyer hears a ridiculous answer like 'endless', is it normal to repeat the ridiculous word, and then change the subject to 'direction'?
To put the word 'endless' into context:
The first 3 enemy supersonic shots consumed 1.6 seconds!
The second burst of 5 enemy supersonic shots consumed 0.78 second!
Therefore, all 8 enemy supersonic shots consumed a total of 2.38 seconds!
Is HSGA Counsel(Majority)'s repetition of the word 'endless' legal malpractice, or just normal expected behavior for a rotten, lying lawyer?
The Hercules2(East) countersniper's real problem was that he wasn't answering about supersonic gunshots.
He was answering about the 24 or more subsonic suppressed gunshots.
In page 57.pdf image below
"I didn't hear a report from a weapon. It seemed, honestly, like it was suppresssed...like it had a suppressor on it, because it didn't...it wasn't like a loud boom that you would expect, being in a ...200 yards away...It was muffled."
Here are images of 2 of the 600 pdf pages.
